Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inbox
Get our free View from Westminster email
Matt Hancock and Kwasi Kwarteng were among MPs who agreed to work for thousands of pounds per day for a fake South Korean firm after being apparently duped by campaign group Led by Donkeys.
The former health secretary and chancellor were both caught on camera naming a day rate for work, with Mr Kwarteng adding that he would expect to be reimbursed for his travel but would not expect a “king’s ransom”.
Mr Kwarteng initially said he would expect £10,000 per month but appeared to agree with an offer of £8,000-£12,000 per day for six board meetings a year that could be face-to-face or virtual.
Mr Hancock, meanwhile, said he had a rate of “around £1,500” per hour.
Recommended
- Matt Hancock becomes unlikely TikTok star after District line mobbing
- Government rules out search of Matt Hancock’s private emails
- Hancock promised care home testing against advice, officials claim
Led by Donkeys came up with the fake company “Hanseong Consulting” and a reporter played “Sooyeon Lee”, the firm’s claimed vice president of external affairs.
The group said it reached out to MPs to join Hanseong’s “advisory board” and had been conducting job interviews on Zoom.
The group, working with journalist Antony Barnett, also approached other top Tories such as former education secretary Gavin Williamson and Sir Graham Brady, chairman of the 1922 Committee. The latter said he was “thinking something like £60,000 as an annual rate”, in a video shared by the group.
In total, they approached 16 Conservatives, two Labour, one Lib Dem and one independent MP, based on their financial “track records”. Of those, five responded with interest – four Tories and one independent, according to a preview video posted on social media.
Mr Barnett said the purpose of the investigation was to find out whether MPs would take a job “furthering the interests of a foreign company on top of their constituency duties”.
Former chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng
(PA Wire)
While there are no restrictions on whether MPs can have second jobs, Led by Donkeys considered it to be an ethical question facing members of parliament after the Owen Patterson and Geoffrey Cox scandals.
Led by Donkeys said they would be releasing further details of the Zoom job interviews over the coming days. It was revealed that Mr Williamson turned down the company at the job interview stage but the other four wanted to proceed.
Thangam Debbonaire MP, Labour’s shadow leader of the House of Commons, said: “Being an MP is a full-time job. Tory MPs should not be using their taxpayer funded offices to line their own pockets. This is shameful at any time but particularly during the cost of living crisis.
“Rishi Sunak promised a government of integrity at every level, yet his own MPs are seemingly breaching the rules. He must act and remove the whip from those involved. Labour will put an end to MPs raking in thousands of pounds on the side and act to restore trust in politics.”
Mr Hancock, Mr Kwarteng, Sir Graham, Mr Williamson and the Conservative Party have all been contacted for a response. None had replied at the time of writing.
Recommended
- MPs Hancock and Kwarteng tell fake firm they will advise for £10,000 per day
- Rishi Sunak urged to block Liz Truss’s reported resignation nominations
- Johnson ally warns ex-PM could face parliamentary ‘witch hunt’ over partygate
A spokesperson for Mr Hancock told The Guardian: “The accusation appears to be that Matt acted entirely properly and within the rules, which had just been unanimously adopted by parliament. It’s absurd to bring Mr Hancock into this story through the illegal publication of a private conversation. All the video shows is Matt acting completely properly.”
Sir Graham, who is stepping down as an MP after his term ends, told The Guardian: “I made it clear any arrangement would have to be completely transparent and that, whilst a member of parliament, I would only act within the terms of the code of conduct. I also made it clear that while I could be flexible in attending international meetings in person, this would be subject to some important votes or commitments in Westminster.”
✕
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
SubscribeAlready subscribed? Log in
Popular videos
{{/link}}