For free real time breaking news alerts sent straight to your inbox sign up to our breaking news emails
Sign up to our free breaking news emails
A man who killed a law graduate as she walked home from a night out has won a legal battle to reduce the minimum term of his life sentence.
Jordan McSweeney killed 35-year-old Zara Aleena in Ilford, east London, in the early hours of on 26 June 26 last year.
McSweeney, who refused to attend his sentencing hearing last December, was handed a life sentence with a minimum term of 38 years after admitting Ms Aleena’s murder and sexual assault. Last month, McSweeny made a bid to reduce his sentence at the Court of Appeal.
In a ruling on Friday, three judges at the appeal court in London allowed McSweeney’s appeal, finding that the sentencing judge had imposed too high an “uplift” to the minimum term.
They replaced it with a life sentence with a minimum term of 33 years rather than the original minimum of 38 years.
Jordan McSweeney murdered Zara Aleena in June 2022
(PA)
Recommended
- Sentencing of Zara Aleena’s killer ‘upsetting and disturbing’ for TV viewers
- Zara Aleena’s killer storms out of sentence appeal hearing as he’d ‘heard enough’
- Zara Aleena’s killer’s sentence reduction bid ‘has reignited family’s agony’
In a summary of the Court of Appeal’s decision, the Lady Chief Justice Lady Carr said the judge lacked a “sufficient evidential basis” of “additional mental or physical suffering” to justify an increase to the starting point of a 30-year minimum term.
Ms Aleena, who was training to be a solicitor, was found struggling to breathe and later died in hospital. (Metropolitan Police/PA)
(PA Media)
She said: “Having correctly found that Ms Aleena must have been rendered unconscious at an early stage in the attack, the judge had lacked a sufficient evidential basis on which to be sure that there had been additional mental or physical suffering such as to justify an increase in the 30-year starting point.
“Mercifully, Ms Aleena was unconscious from early on in the attack. The number of items taken from Ms Aleena and then discarded meant also that it was not safe to conclude that Ms Aleena’s mobile telephone had been taken in order to prevent her from seeking help.”
The Old Bailey previously heard McSweeney stalked Ms Aleena along Cranbrook Road before grabbing her from behind and dragging her into a driveway.
The attack, caught on grainy CCTV, lasted nine minutes and resulted in 46 separate injuries.
CCTV image of sexual predator Jordan McSweeney just before he attacked Zara Aleena.
(PA)
Ms Aleena, who was training to be a solicitor, was found struggling to breathe and later died in hospital.
Judges were told at a hearing in October that Ms Aleena was made unconscious early during the attack.
McSweeney’s barrister George Carter-Stephenson KC said: “Given the nature of the attack … the time for the suffering of this victim was limited. That, to some extent, must impact how one views that as an aggravating feature.”
Ms Aleena’s family have previously spoken out about how McSweeny’s sentencing bid had ‘reignited the family’s agony’.
Her aunt Farah Naz said it was “beyond belief that this individual, who was too spineless to attend his own sentencing, has the audacity to appeal the very sentence he couldn’t be bothered to witness”.
Mr Carter-Stephenson said: “At the outset can I make it clear that it is accepted that the attack and murder in this case was particularly savage and brutal, and nothing I intend to say in this address is in any way meant to detract from that.”
The barrister said the sentencing judge, Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb, had wrongly factored in the “aggravating features” in the case.
Mr Carter-Stephenson said it was accepted there was a sexual motive to the crime, but argued the murder itself was not premeditated.
He added: “The attack was an opportunistic act rather than anything that was planned in advance, though there was clearly a sexual encounter in mind.
“He planned to look for a sexual encounter, with or without consent.”
Farah Naz, aunt of murdered law graduate Zara Aleena, said her killer’s appeal bid has caused the family profound distress (Yui Mok/PA)
(PA Archive)
The barrister later said McSweeney had ADHD, which should have been taken into account in sentencing.
“They are wired somewhat differently than most people. They are impulsive… their behaviour is less predictable,” he said.
However, Oliver Glasgow KC, for the Crown Prosecution Service, said the suggestion McSweeney had not intended to kill Ms Aleena was “unsustainable”.
He told the court McSweeney had spent two hours stalking several women before turning his attention to Ms Aleena.
The barrister told the court in October: “This was not a moment of impulsive aggression. It was a considered act and the product of hours of pursing women along the streets.
“There was nothing that Zara Aleena did that provoked the violence that was given to her.”
The Lady Chief Justice Lady Carr added: “We pay tribute to Ms Aleena and her family. We observe that no sentence for murder can ever reflect the value of the life taken away or attempt to do so.”
More follows on this breaking news story….
✕
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
SubscribeAlready subscribed? Log in
Popular videos
{{/link}}