Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inbox
Get our free View from Westminster email
The closure of two blast furnaces at Britain’s biggest steelworks will lead to thousands of job losses and leave the UK reliant on foreign steel imports for years to come.
In a fresh blow to Rishi Sunak, Tata Steel said it was cutting 2,800 jobs at its plant in Port Talbot in south Wales as it confirmed the closing both blast furnaces at the site.
Amid outrage at the scale of the job losses, the Indian-owned steel giant said it was “not feasible or affordable” to adopt a plan put forward by the GMB and Community unions to keep the furnaces open.
It will mean 2,500 workers will lose their jobs in the next 18 months, with another 300 to come. As well as having a devastating impact on the local community, the closures will leave Britain reliant on foreign steel imports, including from India and China.
Labour said foreign powers “won’t always have Britain’s best interests at heart”, as Sir Keir Starmer’s party condemned Mr Sunak for failing to take up a “better” union-led plan to transition to greener production.
A replacement so-called electric arc furnace, a greener way of making steel, will not come online until 2027 at the earliest. In the meantime, Britain will be forced to plug the gaps left by the Port Talbot closures with imports from abroad, which critics say will lead to higher emissions until the replacement comes online.
Experts said the UK’s domestic emissions would as much as 3 per cent because of the closures, but this would be offset and could even be surpassed by an increase in Britain’s global carbon footprint once imports are accounted for.
Steel worker wearing a badge on his jacket outside the UK’s largest steel works in Port Talbot
(PA)
Roz Bulleid, research director at the Green Alliance think tank, told The Independent: “Exactly what happens to the UK’s wider carbon footprint during the transition depends on where we get the steel from to replace British production.
“Europe has a mixture of blast furnaces and lower-carbon production, while Asia has more blast furnace production,” the green economist said. “But, over time, we will see European emissions fall. This is a race to low-carbon steelmaking that the UK risks missing out on.”
And, in a damning indictment of UK industry, the closures will also leave Britain as the only G20 country that can’t make virgin primary steel. Virgin steel is used in everyday products such as the tins for Heinz baked beans.
These will now have to be produced abroad, with their manufacturing unlikely to return to the UK. The closures and job cuts come despite Tata being promised up to £500m by the UK government in a bid to keep the plant open and produce steel in a greener way.
The Port Talbot plant is the largest steelworks in the UK and currently employs 4,000 of the company’s 8,000-strong UK workforce. The move means almost 75 per cent of workers lose their jobs. The GMB said the job losses are a “crushing blow to Port Talbot and UK manufacturing in general”.
Charlotte Brumpton-Childs, national officer for steel, said: “It doesn’t have to be that way – unions provided a realistic, costed alternative that would rule out all compulsory redundancies.” But she said the plan has “fallen on deaf ears” and steelworkers and their families will now suffer.
Andrew Gutteridge, chairman of the Multi Unions Llanwern works, said it would cause “absolute ruin” in the community, with unions estimating each job at the steelworks created another three in the sider economy.
“Your local newsagents, your chip shops, your supermarkets – everything in this area will be affected,” he said. “This is a massive, massive kick for the whole of south Wales really.”
Tata Steel said it was ‘not feasible or affordable’ to adopt a union plan
(Getty Images)
Sir Keir said he was “very concerned” by the job losses at Tata Steel – urging Rishi Sunak to listen to the “better plan” offered by unions to prevent so many redundancies.
“The government said it had a plan for steel. It transpires the plan involves thousands of redundancies. There’s a better plan – a multi-union plan – that the government needs to look at again,” the Labour leader told broadcasters.
Asked if he agreed that the government’s £500m investment had helped limit redundancies, Sir Keir said: “I’m not against the government investment … but their plan involves all of these redundancies when there’s a different and better plan on the table.”
The so-called multi-union plan was put forward by the GMB and Community unions under which Tata Steel could have transitioned Port Talbot toward greener steelmaking over a longer timeline.
Under the plan, there would have been no compulsory redundancies and Britain’s domestic steel supply would have been protected.
In a joint statement, GMB and Community said they were “extremely disappointed” that Tata had rejected the alternative plans they presented. The unions met Tata representatives on Thursday in a last ditch attempt to push the multi-union plan.
Rishi Sunak insisted the government is ‘absolutely committed’ to British steelmaking
(PA Wire)
The two unions lashed out at Unite, which also represents workers at the plant, for “undermining” the plan and “unilaterally campaigning for discredited fantasy solutions”.
And they took aim at Tata and the UK government, saying it is a “disgrace” that they appear “intent on pursuing the cheapest instead of the best plan for our industry, our steelworkers and our country”.
Mr Sunak said the government is “absolutely committed” to British steelmaking, adding: “I know first of all that it will be a worrying time for everyone affected.”
He said the alternative was the entire plant being closed, leading to 8,000 job losses overall. “But the government worked with the company,” he said.
Welsh first minister Mark Drakeford’s office condemned Mr Sunak after No 10 said he was “not available” for urgent talks requested about the potential loss of thousands of jobs.
Labour’s shadow business secretary Jonathan Reynolds has previously attacked the government over the funding package, saying: “Only the Tories could spend £500m of taxpayers’ money to make thousands of British workers redundant.”
Stephen Kinnock said the job cuts will be ‘absolutely devastating’
(Getty Images)
Stephen Kinnock, Labour MP for Aberavon, home of the Port Talbot steelworks, said the losses will be “utterly devastating”, describing the situation as “deeply frustrating and unnecessary”.
He said: “Global demand for steel is actually growing, but by pursuing a narrow electric arc furnace-only model, Tata Steel will be unable to seize the commercial opportunities of the future, while at the same time leaving Britain more dependent on imported steel from countries whose governments won’t always have Britain’s best interests at heart.”
Tata chief executive T V Narendran said the decision was “difficult” but “we believe it is the right one”.
“We recognise this proposed restructuring would have a major impact on the individuals and communities concerned, whom we will support with dignity and respect,” he added.
Mr Narendran told Times Radio the steel giant has been “struggling to survive for the last 15 years” but “obviously all that we did was not enough”.
He claimed the union plan would have cost £800m more – £600m to keep one blast furnace running while £200m would have gone on the cost building the electric arc furnace.
✕
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
SubscribeAlready subscribed? Log in
Popular videos
{{/link}}